Cal High Court Lets Stand Starbucks Award Reversal
By wchung | 23 Mar, 2026
The California Supreme Court will not review a appeals court ruling that wiped out an $86 million judgment against coffee giant Starbucks over tip sharing at its stores in the state.
The court did not explain why it refused to take up the case at its weekly conference Wednesday.
In 2008, a San Diego County Superior Court judge ordered Starbucks Corp. to pay millions in restitution to baristas who had to share their tips with supervisors.
In June, the 4th District Court of Appeal reversed that ruling, saying that supervisors perform the same job as baristas and should get their share of collective tip jars.
Former barista Jou Chau filed the class-action lawsuit in 2004 on behalf of more than 100,000 current and former baristas in California. Laura Ho of Goldstein, Demchak, Baller, Borgen & Dardarian of Oakland, CA. tried the case on behalf of Chau and the other Starbucks baristas certified as the plaintiff class. The initial award of $105 million had been reduced to $86 mil. prior to the first appeal.
9/10/2009 1:25 AM SAN DIEGO (AP)
Articles
- Top 5 Date Turn-Offs for Women and Men
- Demand Builds for Affordable Chinese EVs Among American Carbuyers
- OpenAI Bumps Up Minimum Return to 17.5% in Competition with Anthropic for Private Equity
- China's Open-Source AI Dominates Global Downloads, Threatens US Leadership
- Alphabet's Wing to Begin Drone Deliveries in San Francisco Bay Area
- Strikes Paused on Talks Denied by Iran
- ICE Agents Deployed to 14 Major Airports Amid Rising TSA Absences
- How Daiso Became Japan’s Dollar Tree
- How Charles and Sara Liang Survived One Scandal After Another to Build a $20-Billion AI Giant
- SpaceX, Tesla to Build AI Chip Factories in Austin
