Cal High Court Lets Stand Starbucks Award Reversal
By wchung | 23 Jun, 2026
The California Supreme Court will not review a appeals court ruling that wiped out an $86 million judgment against coffee giant Starbucks over tip sharing at its stores in the state.
The court did not explain why it refused to take up the case at its weekly conference Wednesday.
In 2008, a San Diego County Superior Court judge ordered Starbucks Corp. to pay millions in restitution to baristas who had to share their tips with supervisors.
In June, the 4th District Court of Appeal reversed that ruling, saying that supervisors perform the same job as baristas and should get their share of collective tip jars.
Former barista Jou Chau filed the class-action lawsuit in 2004 on behalf of more than 100,000 current and former baristas in California. Laura Ho of Goldstein, Demchak, Baller, Borgen & Dardarian of Oakland, CA. tried the case on behalf of Chau and the other Starbucks baristas certified as the plaintiff class. The initial award of $105 million had been reduced to $86 mil. prior to the first appeal.
9/10/2009 1:25 AM SAN DIEGO (AP)
Recent Articles
- US on Track to Break World Cup Attendance Record Despite High Ticket Prices
- S. Korea Coach Warns Team Against Complacency Before South Africa Match
- Senate Joins House to Require Trump to Seek Approval for Iran Hostilities
- US Consumers Favor Homebuying over Renting for First Time Since 2023
- US Manufacturing Rises but Factory Employment Falls to Six-Year Low
- Meta Launches Cheaper AI Smart Glasses Starting at $299
- How the Philippines Went from an Asian Economic Leader to Laggard
- Pakistan May See Economic Dividend from Its Role As Peacekeeper
- KOSPI Plunges Nearly 10% After Regulator Warns on Leveraged ETFs
- Asian Refiners See Little Room for Iranian Oil, Leaving China as Key Buyer After US Waiver
